Table of Contents

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File No. 0-23590

NEXXUS LIGHTING, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

124 FLOYD SMITH DRIVE, SUITE 300, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28262

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(704) 405-0416

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Number of shares of Common Stock, $.001 par value, outstanding on August 5, 2009: 8,584,460

Table of Contents

Nexxus Lighting, Inc.

Index to Form 10-Q

2

Table of Contents

Nexxus Lighting, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

Nexxus Lighting, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

Nexxus Lighting, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

5

Table of Contents

Nexxus Lighting, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

Nexxus Lighting, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Nexxus Lighting, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) are unaudited, but in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as of and for the dates and periods presented. The financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information.

These unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year ending December 31, 2009 or for any future period.

Revenue recognition – Generally, the Company recognizes revenue for its products upon shipment to customers, provided no significant obligations remain and collection is probable. For sales that include customer acceptance terms, revenue is recorded after customer acceptance. Our products typically carry a warranty that ranges from two to five years and includes replacement of defective parts. A warranty reserve is recorded for estimated costs associated with potential warranty expenses on previous sales.

Financial instruments – In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 introduces a framework for measuring fair value and expands required disclosure about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted the standard for those financial assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the 2008 fiscal year and the impact of adoption was not significant. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2009. The Company uses the market approach to measure fair value for its Level 1 financial assets and liabilities, which includes cash equivalents. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash, trade receivables, related party payables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for these financial instruments since they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are receivable or payable on demand.

On June 18, 2009, the Company entered into a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (Note 7). The Promissory Notes were valued using observable inputs other than quoted prices (Level 2). The Company used a third party valuation firm to value the Promissory Notes. Using a simulation model of discounted cash flows, the relative fair value of the Notes was calculated to be $3,229,675.

On January 1, 2009, the Company applied FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (FAS 157), for all non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in accordance with FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FAS 157” (FSP 157-2), which postponed the effective date of FAS 157 for those assets and liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, which for the Company is January 1, 2009. The application of FSP 157-2 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. The Company’s non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include goodwill and other intangible assets. In a business combination, the non-financial assets and liabilities of the acquired company would be measured at fair value in accordance with FAS 157. The requirements of FAS 157

7

Table of Contents

include using an exit price based on an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date assuming the highest and best use of the asset by market participants. The Company would use a market, income or cost approach valuation technique to perform the valuations. Since the Company performs its annual impairment analyses of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets in the fourth quarter of each year and since no impairment trigger event occurred during the first quarter of 2009, the application of FAS 157 for all non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. However, there may be an impact during 2009 on the Company’s financial position and results of operations when the Company performs an impairment analysis of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets due to the difference in fair value methodology required under FAS 157.

Derivative financial instruments – The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133), and its related interpretations, and complies with SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS 138). SFAS 133 and SFAS 138 establish accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities.

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risk. Terms of convertible preferred stock instruments are reviewed to determine whether or not they contain embedded derivative instruments that are required under SFAS 133 to be accounted for separately from the host contract, and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value of derivative liabilities, if any, is required to be revalued at each reporting date, with corresponding changes in fair value recorded in current period operating results.

Freestanding warrants issued by the Company in connection with the issuance or sale of debt and equity instruments are considered to be derivative instruments, and are evaluated and accounted for in accordance with the provisions of the Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (EITF) No. 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock” (EITF 00-19). Pursuant to EITF 00-19, an evaluation of specifically identified conditions is made to determine whether the fair value of warrants issued is required to be classified as equity or as a derivative liability.

Beneficial conversion and warrant valuation – In accordance with EITF No. 98-5, “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios” and EITF No. 00-27, “Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments”, the Company records a beneficial conversion feature (BCF) related to the issuance of convertible debt or preferred stock instruments that have conversion features at fixed rates that are in-the-money when issued, and the fair value of warrants issued in connection with those instruments. The BCF for the convertible instruments is recognized and measured by allocating a portion of the proceeds to warrants, based on their relative fair value, and as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible instrument equal to the intrinsic value of the conversion feature. The discount recorded in connection with the BCF and warrant valuation is recognized as non-cash implied preferred dividends from the date of issuance to the earliest conversion date, using the effective yield method.

Cash equivalents – Temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Accounts receivable – Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms. The Company performs continuing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on specifically identified amounts that it believes to be uncollectible. Recovery of bad debt amounts previously written off is recorded as a reduction of bad debt expense in the period the payment is collected. If the Company’s actual collection experience changes, revisions to its allowance may be required. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance.

Inventories – Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (average cost) or market. A reserve is recorded for any inventory deemed excessive or obsolete.

Property and equipment – Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method and is charged to operations over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Amortization expense related to property held under capital lease is included with depreciation in the accompanying statements of operations and accumulated depreciation in the accompanying balance sheets. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. The carrying amount and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts in the year of disposal and any resulting gain or loss is included in results of operations. The estimated useful lives of property and equipment are as follows:

8

Table of Contents

Intangible assets and goodwill – The Company accounts for its intangible assets and goodwill under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS 142) and FASB Statement No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (SFAS 144).

Deferred rent – The Company accounts for certain operating leases containing predetermined fixed increases of the base rental rate during the lease term as rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company has recorded the difference between the amounts charged to operations and amounts payable under the leases as deferred rent in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Long lived assets – The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, based on expected undiscounted cash flows and will recognize impairment of the carrying value of long-lived assets, if any is indicated, based on the fair value of such assets.

Customer Deposits – Payments received by the Company for products to be provided in the following year are deferred and recognized as revenue in the period the products are shipped.

Shipping and handling costs – Shipping and handling costs related to the acquisition of goods from vendors are included in cost of sales.

Income taxes – Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes resulting from temporary differences. Such temporary differences result from differences in the carrying value of assets and liabilities for tax and financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, on January 1, 2007. The Company has not recognized a liability as a result of the implementation of Interpretation 48. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits has not been provided since there is no unrecognized benefit since the date of adoption. The Company has not recognized interest expense or penalties as a result of the implementation of Interpretation 48. If there were an unrecognized tax benefit, the Company would recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.

Use of estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Loss per share – Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares may consist of incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants. In periods in which a net loss has been incurred, all potentially dilutive common shares are considered antidilutive and thus are excluded from the calculation. Employee stock options and warrants were not included in the computation of loss per share at June 30, 2009 and 2008 because to do so would have been anti-dilutive. At June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company had 5,306,107 and 3,970,099 potentially dilutive common shares, respectively.

Stock-based compensation – The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the provisions of SFAS 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”, which requires the recognition of the cost of employee or director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments in the financial statements and is measured based on the grant date fair value of the award. SFAS 123(R) also requires the stock option compensation expense to be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (typically, the vesting period).

9

Table of Contents

The Company estimates the fair value of each option award issued under its stock option plans on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model that uses the assumptions noted below in accordance with SFAS 123(R). The Company estimates the volatility of its common stock at the date of grant based on the historical volatility of its common stock. These historical periods may exclude portions of time when unusual transactions occurred. The Company determines the expected life based on historical experience with similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and post-vesting forfeitures. For shares that vest contingent upon achievement of certain performance criteria, an estimate of the probability of achievement is applied in the estimate of fair value. If the goals are not met, no compensation cost is recognized and any previously recognized compensation cost is reversed. The Company bases the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with an equivalent remaining term approximately equal to the expected life of the award. The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the Company separates the grants into homogeneous groups and analyzes the assumptions for each group. The Company then computes the expense for each group utilizing these assumptions.

Under SFAS 123(R), stock-based compensation expenses recognized in the accompanying unaudited statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $99,078 and $124,611, respectively, which caused net loss to increase by that amount and basic and diluted loss per share attributable to common stockholders for 2009 and 2008 to increase by $0.01. Stock-based compensation expense recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $219,841 and $158,088, respectively, which caused net loss to increase by that amount and basic and diluted loss per share for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 to increase by $0.03 and $0.01, respectively.

Business segments – Pursuant to SFAS No. 131, “Disclosure about Segments of a Business Enterprise and Related Information”, the Company is required to report segment information. As the Company only operates in principally one business segment, no additional reporting is required.

Recent accounting pronouncements – In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (SFAS 141(R)), which applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses, including those sometimes referred to as “true mergers” or “mergers of equals” and combinations achieved without the transfer of consideration. This statement replaces FASB Statement No. 141 and applies to all business entities, including mutual entities that previously used the pooling-of-interests method of accounting for some business combinations. The Company adopted SFAS 141(R) beginning in 2009. The adoption of SFAS 141(R) will have an effect on the Company’s operating results with respect to future acquisitions, if any.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies” (FSP 141(R)-1), which amends and clarifies SFAS 141(R) to address application issues on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. FSP 141(R)-1 is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. The Company adopted FSP 141(R)-1 beginning in 2009. The adoption of FSP 141(R)-1 may have an effect on the Company’s operating results with respect to future acquisitions, if any.

In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13” (FSP 157-1). FSP 157-1 amends SFAS 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. In addition, on February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (FSP 157-2), which amends SFAS 157 by delaying its effective date by one year for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. This pronouncement was effective upon issuance. The Company deferred the adoption of SFAS 157 with respect to all non-financial assets and liabilities in accordance with the provisions of this pronouncement. On January 1, 2009, SFAS 157 became applicable to all other fair value measurements for which the application was deferred under FSP 157-2. SFAS 157 did not have an impact on the Company’s assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements.

10

Table of Contents

On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (FSP 157-3). The FSP clarifies the application of FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. The FSP was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The provisions of FSP 157-3 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (FSP 157-4), which provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS 157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. FSP 157-4 re-emphasizes that regardless of market conditions, the fair value measurement is an exit price concept as defined in SFAS 157, and clarifies and includes additional factors to consider in determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset or liability and provides additional clarification on estimating fair value when the market activity for an asset or liability has declined significantly. FSP 157-4 is applied prospectively to all fair value measurements where appropriate. The Company adopted the provisions of FSP 157-4 effective April 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP 157-4 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. It requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The Company adopted SFAS 161 beginning in 2009. The adoption of SFAS 161 did not have an impact on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (FSP 142-3). This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. This FSP also adds certain disclosures to those already prescribed in SFAS 142. FSP 142-3 become effective on January 1, 2009. The guidance for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of the effective date. The adoption of FSP 142-3 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities”. The FSP concludes that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are participating securities under FASB Statement No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” and should be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that is used to determine earnings per share for each class of common stock according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The Company adopted EITF 03-6-1 beginning in 2009. The adoption of EITF 03-6-1 did not have an impact on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In June 2008, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus regarding EITF Issue No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (EITF 07-5). EITF 07-5 outlines a two-step approach to evaluate the instrument’s contingent exercise provisions, if any, and to evaluate the instrument’s settlement provisions when determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The Company adopted EITF 07-5 beginning in 2009. The adoption of EITF 07-5 did not have an impact on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. SFAS 107-1 (FSP 107-1) and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (APB 28-1). FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 amend FASB Statement No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements and also amend Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting”, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. The Company adopted FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 upon issuance. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

11

Table of Contents

In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (FAS 165). FAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The new standard is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FAS 165 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standard Codification™ (“Codification”) and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. This statement replaces SFAS 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” and establishes the Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles used in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The Codification does not replace or affect guidance issued by the SEC or its staff. After the effective date of this statement, all non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will be superseded and deemed non-authoritative.

Inventories consist of the following:

At June 30, 2009, the Company had the following intangible assets:

12

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2008, the Company had the following intangible assets:

Remaining estimated annual amortization expense is approximately as follows:

At June 30, 2009, the Company had $219,437 of patent applications and pending patents and trademarks. Estimated annual amortization for these patent applications and pending patents and trademarks is not included in the table above.

In order to reduce operating expenses and increase synergies between its business lines, the Company made a strategic decision in the fourth quarter of 2008 to integrate the operations of its wholly owned subsidiary, Advanced Lighting Systems, LLC (ALS), with Nexxus’ operations in Orlando, Florida. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company closed ALS’ Sauk Centre facility and transferred production to its Orlando facility and to existing third party manufacturers. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had accrued employee stay bonuses and termination benefits of $18,194 and $22,681, respectively. In addition, as of December 31, 2008, the Company had accrued a $565,500 liability for the settlement of a related party office lease termination and certain severance obligations, which was paid by issuing 78,000 shares of common stock in April 2009. In connection with this restructuring, the Company incurred approximately $9,000 of additional stay bonuses and termination benefits in 2009.

The Company adopted a stock option plan in 1994 (the “1994 Plan”) that provided for the grant of incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options, and reserved 450,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for future issuance under the plan. The option price must have been at least 100% of market value at the date of the grant and the options have a maximum term of 10 years. Options granted typically vest ratably over a three-year period or based on achievement of performance criteria. The Company typically grants selected executives and other key employees share option awards, whose vesting is contingent upon meeting various departmental and company-wide performance goals including sales targets and net profit targets. As of June 30, 2009, options to purchase 21,750 shares of common stock were vested and exercisable under the 1994 Plan. The 1994 Plan terminated in 2004.

13

Table of Contents

On September 18, 2003, the Company adopted a new stock option plan (the “2003 Plan”) that provides for the grant of incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options, and reserved 450,000 additional shares of the Company’s common stock for future issuance under the plan. The 2003 Plan was subsequently amended to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder to 670,000. During the second quarter of 2008, the 2003 Plan was further amended to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance to 810,000. The option price of incentive stock options must be at least 100% of market value at the date of the grant and incentive stock options have a maximum term of 10 years. Options granted typically vest ratably over a three-year period or based on achievement of performance criteria. The Company typically grants selected executives and other key employees share option awards, whose vesting is contingent upon meeting various departmental and company-wide performance goals including sales targets and net profit targets. As of June 30, 2009, options to purchase 430,657 shares of common stock were vested and exercisable under the 2003 Plan. In March 2009, the Company amended the 2003 Plan to extend the post-service termination exercise period of nonstatutory stock options granted to directors for their service to the Company as directors from three months after the director’s termination date to the tenth anniversary of the date of grant.

The following table summarizes activity in the stock option plans for the six months ended June 30, 2009:

The weighted average fair value of options granted at market during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $5.07 and $5.01 per option, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $107,796 and $87,389, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding exercisable options at June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $773,433 and $1,385,240, respectively.

At June 30, 2009, the Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, of which 3,000 shares have been designated as Series A Preferred Stock.

On November 11, 2008, the Company entered into a Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the Stock Purchase Agreement) with a limited number of stockholders and their affiliates, all of which were accredited investors. Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company issued Series A convertible preferred stock (the Preferred Stock) and warrants in a private placement, for aggregate consideration of $7,855,776 (before issuance costs incurred in 2008 of $390,513), consisting of $3,974,600 in cash, cancellation of $3,592,630 in principal and accrued interest on the Company’s secured promissory notes and $288,546 as compensation for issuance costs in lieu of cash. The net proceeds are being used for working capital and general corporate purposes, including supporting the launch of new products.

14

Table of Contents

The Company issued 1,513.45 units of Preferred Stock and warrants (Preferred Stock Units) at a stated value of $5,000 per unit for an aggregate consideration of $7,567,230. Each unit consists of one share of Series A convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 750 shares of common stock (totaling 1,135,083 common shares under warrants) at an exercise price of $6.40 per share expiring three years from the date of issuance. An additional 57.71 units were issued to the placement agent, consisting of 57.71 shares of Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 43,282 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of $6.40 per share. Because the Preferred Stock was not redeemed prior to six months after the closing date of the transaction, warrants to purchase 375 additional shares of the Company’s common stock per unit were issued. If the Preferred Stock is not redeemed prior to one year after the closing date of the agreement, warrants to purchase 375 additional shares of the Company’s common stock per unit will be issued. If the Preferred Stock, or a portion of the Preferred Stock, is redeemed after six months but prior to one year after the closing date of the agreement, the warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock will be prorated for the time the Preferred Stock is outstanding. In total, if the Preferred Stock remains outstanding for one year, the holders of Preferred Stock will be issued warrants to purchase a total of 1,500 shares of common stock for each Preferred Stock Unit (collectively, the Preferred Warrants), for a total of 2,356,731 common shares under warrants.

The Preferred Stock is redeemable by the Company at any time and the holders are initially entitled to cumulative dividends at the rate of 8% per annum, increasing to 10% commencing 180 days after the date of issuance and 16% commencing 360 days after the date of issuance. The dividends are payable in cash, with an initial payment date of November 1, 2009. At the option of the holder, the preferred stock is convertible at any time commencing four years after issuance into shares of common stock at a conversion rate equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock at the time of the conversion or $6.59, whichever is greater. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had accrued $418,975 of dividends.

Preferred Stock Units Issued for Cash – The Company issued 794.92 Preferred Stock Units for cash consideration of $3,974,600. EITF No. 98-5, “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios” (EITF 98-5), as amended and interpreted by EITF No. 00-27, “Application of Issue 98-5 to Certain Convertible Securities” (EITF 00-27), requires companies to calculate an effective conversion rate which gives effect to the allocation of proceeds from the transactions to the warrants on a relative fair value basis. To allocate the proceeds based on the relative fair values of the Preferred Stock and the Preferred Warrants, the Company used a third party valuation firm to value the Preferred Stock and the Preferred Warrants. Using a simulation model of discounted cash flows, the relative fair value of the Preferred Warrants was estimated to be $1,806,837 on the date of issue, which is recorded in additional paid-in capital. The total allocated to the Preferred Stock was $2,167,763, of which $1,806,838 was allocated to the beneficial conversion feature and is recorded in additional paid-in capital. A beneficial conversion feature is recorded when the consideration allocated to the convertible security, divided by the number of common shares into which the security converts, is below the fair value of the common stock at the date of issuance of the convertible instruments.

Preferred Stock Units Exchanged for Promissory Notes – In exchange for the cancellation of $3,500,000 in principal amount of secured promissory notes and $92,630 of accrued interest relating to the promissory notes, the Company issued 718.53 Preferred Stock Units. The fair value of the Preferred Stock Units was determined using a simulation model of discounted cash flows by a third party valuation firm and was estimated to be $5,000 per unit, for a total gross fair value of $3,592,630 on the date of issue. The third party valuation firm estimated the fair value of the Preferred Warrants to total $1,633,195. The gross fair value of the Preferred Stock totaled $1,959,435, of which $1,633,195 was allocated to the beneficial conversion feature and is recorded in additional paid-in capital.

Preferred Stock Units Issued to the Placement Agent – The Company issued 57.71 Preferred Stock Units to the placement agent in exchange for services received. The Company estimated the fair value of the services received to be $288,546, based on the agreement with the placement agent. Using a simulation model of discounted cash flows, the fair value of the Preferred Warrants was estimated to be $131,172 on the date of issue, which is recorded in additional paid-in capital. The total allocated to the Preferred Stock was $157,374, of which $131,172 was allocated to the beneficial conversion feature and is recorded in additional paid-in capital.

Following the allocation of the beneficial conversion features and Preferred Warrants above, the Company considered the probability that the Preferred Stock holders would convert to common stock. The Preferred Stock is redeemable by the Company at any time and a percentage is redeemable at the option of the holder if the Company raises equity capital in excess of $5,000,000. Although the Preferred Stock does not have a stated maturity provision, the Company believes the conversion to common stock or redemption of the Preferred Stock, is more likely than not. As a result, the Company is required to recognize as a deemed dividend, the amount by which the stated value of the preferred stock exceeds the carrying value. The deemed

15

Table of Contents

distribution of $7,142,409 is recorded as an accretion to the Preferred Stock in our stockholders’ equity and a charge to additional paid-in capital, as the Company has an accumulated deficit on the date of the transaction, over the four-year period from the date of issuance to the earliest conversion date using the effective yield method. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, $268,311 of the deemed distribution has been recognized as a return to the preferred shareholders and has been reflected as an adjustment to the net loss attributable to common stockholders on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

The Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement contains certain financial covenant requirements and other provisions, the failure of which would result in an Event of Default, resulting in an immediate increase in the stated dividend rate to 16% and the right to designate one member of the Company’s Board of Directors. As of June 30, 2009, the Company is in compliance with all related financial covenants and no Event of Default has occurred.

On June 18, 2009, the Company entered into a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the Note Purchase Agreement), with a limited number of accredited investors. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, the Company sold an aggregate of $3,800,000 in principal amount of secured promissory notes (the Notes) and 285,000 warrants (the Note Warrants) to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The Notes are payable in full on January 5, 2011 and incur simple interest at the rate of 10.0% per year. The interest is payable a year after the closing date and at maturity. The Notes are secured by all of the assets of the Company.

The Note Warrants are immediately exercisable at an exercise price of $6.43 per share and expire three years after the date of issuance. Note Warrants to purchase 0.075 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued for each $1.00 in principal amount of the Notes sold to each purchaser. The Note Purchase Agreement requires additional warrants (the Additional Warrants) to be issued at the earlier of a year after the issuance date of the Notes, or the date on which the principal and interest on the Notes is paid in full. The Additional Warrants accrue ratably over the 365 day period at a rate of 7.5% of the aggregate principal amount of all Notes issued pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, and otherwise carry the same terms as the Note Warrants issued upon closing of the Note Purchase Agreement. If the Notes remain outstanding for a year, 285,000 Additional Warrants will be issued. If the Notes, or a portion of the Notes, are redeemed prior to one year after the date the Notes were issued, the number of Additional Warrants issued will be prorated for the time the Notes are outstanding.

The Company used a third party valuation firm to value the Notes, Note Warrants, and Additional Warrants. Using a simulation model of discounted cash flows, the relative fair value of the Notes was calculated to be $3,229,675. The fair value of the Note Warrants and Additional Warrants was calculated to be $570,325. The fair value of the Note Warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: Expected life in years: 3; Estimated volatility: 30%; Risk-free interest rate: 1.86%; Dividend yield: 0%. The fair value of the Additional Warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes model with a probability matrix for the number of warrants issued and the vesting date of the warrants: Expected life in years: 3; Estimated volatility: 30%; Dividend yield: 0%; Risk-free interest rate: weighted average based on the time to expiration with the 5 year US Treasury bill rate of 2.86%.

The proceeds from the Notes have been discounted for the relative fair value of the Note Warrants and Additional Warrants of $570,325, which was recorded as additional paid-in capital. The discount is amortized over the life of the Notes using the effective interest method. As of June 30, 2009, $11,183 of the discount has been amortized to interest expense.

The Company incurred $196,353 of deferred financing costs which are being amortized over the life of the Notes using the effective interest method. The Company issued 20,684 shares of common stock to the placement agent for services in connection with the private placement. The Company estimated the fair value of the services received to be $133,000, based on the agreement with the placement agent. As of June 30, 2009, $3,848 of the deferred financing costs has been amortized to interest expense.

In the ordinary course of business the Company may become a party to various legal proceedings generally involving contractual matters, infringement actions, product liability claims and other matters. The Company is not currently a party to any pending legal proceedings.

16

Table of Contents

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through August 14, 2009, the date on which this Form 10-Q was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. No material subsequent events have occurred since June 30, 2009 that requires recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.

17

Table of Contents

The following discussion and analysis provides information that management believes is useful in understanding our operating results, cash flows and financial condition. The discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report and the audited Financial Statements and related Notes to Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. All references in this report on Form 10-Q to “Nexxus,” “Nexxus Lighting,” “we,” “us,” “our company,” or “our” refer to Nexxus Lighting, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where it is clear that such terms mean only Nexxus Lighting, Inc. or our subsidiaries, Advanced Lighting Systems, LLC and Lumificient Corporation.

Except for the historical information contained herein, the discussions in this report contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe-harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, the attainment of which involve various risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expect”, “plan”, “believe”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “continue”, “predict”, “forecast”, “intend”, “potential”, or similar terms, variations of those terms or the negative of those terms. Our actual results may differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements due to, among other factors, competition in each of our product areas, including price competition, dependence on suppliers, the success of our sales, marketing and product development efforts, the condition of the international marketplace, general economic and business conditions, the evolving nature of our fiber optic and LED lighting technology, the success of our strategic acquisitions, if any, and our ability to successfully integrate businesses we acquire, if any. Additional information concerning these or other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained or projected in, or even implied by, such forward-looking statements is contained in this report and also from time to time in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. Readers should carefully review the risk factors described in other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking information will prove to be accurate. Neither our company nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these forward-looking statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report on Form 10-Q to conform our prior statements to actual results.

Overview

We design, manufacture, market and sell advanced lighting solutions, including light emitting diode (LED) and fiber optic lighting. We offer a broad range of technically innovative white light, color-changing and fixed-color lighting solutions that are used for applications in commercial/architectural, retail, hospitality, entertainment and consumer markets. We offer one of the broadest portfolios of advanced lighting solutions. Our LED products include spot lights, flood lights, linear strips and down lights. Our fiber optic products include fixtures, cable and light sources.

We generate revenue from selling our products into two primary markets: commercial/architectural and pool and spa. Commercial sales include applications of our fixtures, systems and lamp (light bulb) products in the architectural, retail, hospitality, entertainment, signage and consumer markets. In the first quarter of 2009, we integrated the operations of our Advanced Lighting Systems subsidiary into our SV Lighting Division, creating the new Nexxus Commercial Lighting Division. We now serve the commercial markets through our Nexxus Commercial Lighting Division and Lumificient subsidiary. Pool and spa sales include applications of our products in the pool, spa and water feature markets served by the Nexxus Lighting Pool and Spa Division. Each of our divisions markets and distributes products globally through multiple networks of independent sales representatives and distributors.

We sell LED and fiber optic products into each of our two markets. Sales of LED lighting products accounted for approximately 74% and 64% of our revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Sales of fiber optic lighting products accounted for approximately 21% and 33% of our revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The balance of our revenue was derived from sales of water feature products. We believe that our LED product lines offer significant revenue growth potential domestically and internationally for both the commercial and pool and spa lighting markets. While we expect our fiber optic products to remain a significant portion of our business, we believe that the sale of our LED lighting products will continue to increase as a percentage of our total revenue and drive our growth in the future.

18

Table of Contents

Acquisition

On April 30, 2008, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Lumificient Corporation (Lumificient), a Maple Grove, Minnesota manufacturer of solid-state LED products for the sign lighting, commercial/architectural and retail markets, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement, dated as of April 30, 2008, among Nexxus Lighting, Lumificient and the shareholders of Lumificient. This strategic acquisition is expected to strengthen our position in the signage lighting market and enhance our research and development capabilities.

Results of Operations

Revenue: Revenue is derived from sales of our advanced lighting products. These products consist of solid-state LED lighting systems and controls as well as fiber optic lighting cables and fiber optic lighting sources and accessories. We also design, manufacture, market and sell LED and fiber optically lit waterfalls and water features. We market and distribute our products globally primarily through multiple networks of independent sales representatives and distributors. Variations in the mix of sales of product types can result in fluctuations in revenue. Revenue is subject to both quarterly and annual fluctuations as a result of product mix considerations.

We sell our products pursuant to purchase orders and do not have any long-term contracts with our customers. We recognize revenue upon shipment to our customers. Delays in product orders or changes to the timing of shipments could cause our quarterly revenue to vary significantly. The majority of our sales are to the North American market (which includes Canada but excludes Mexico for our purposes) and we expect that region to continue to be a major source of revenue for us. However, we also derive a substantial portion of our revenue from customers outside of the North American market. All of our revenue is denominated in US dollars.

Cost of sales: Cost of sales consists primarily of raw materials, labor, manufacturing-related overhead such as utilities, depreciation, rent, provisions for excess and obsolete inventory reserves, freight and warranties. We manufacture our products based on customer orders. We purchase materials and supplies to support customer demand.

Gross profit: Our gross profit has been and will continue to be affected by a variety of factors, including average sales prices of our products, product mix, our ability to reduce manufacturing costs and fluctuations in the cost of our purchased components. We define direct gross margin as revenue less material cost.

Operating expenses: Operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and associated costs for employees in finance, human resources, sales, information technology and administrative activities. In addition, operating expenses include charges relating to accounting, legal, insurance and stock-based compensation under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.”

Three months ended June 30, 2009 vs. 2008

Revenue and Gross Profit

Total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was approximately $2,605,000 as compared to approximately $3,844,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008, a decrease of approximately $1,239,000. Revenue benefitted from the April 30, 2008 acquisition of Lumificient Corporation (Lumificient), which serves the commercial and signage lighting market. Excluding revenue attributable to Lumificient from our consolidated results, revenue decreased to approximately $1,767,000 in the second quarter of 2009 compared to approximately $3,186,000 in the second quarter of 2008.

Revenue from sales of commercial lighting products decreased by $829,000, or 34%, from approximately $2,458,000 in the second quarter of 2008 to approximately $1,629,000 in the second quarter of 2009. Excluding revenue attributable to Lumificient, our commercial product sales decreased $1,009,000, or 56%, in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008, driven primarily by significant decreases in commercial construction activity across the US. Sales of our newly introduced Array™ LED lamps were approximately $197,000 in the second quarter of 2009.

19

Table of Contents

Revenue from sales of pool and spa lighting products was approximately $976,000 in the second quarter of 2009, as compared to $1,386,000 for the same period of 2008. Revenue decreased $410,000, or 30%, reflecting the continued significant year over year reductions in the pool and OEM spa markets tied to the steep drop in demand for luxury items related to the US recession. In addition, our distributors responded to tight market conditions by lowering inventories, further dampening our sales.

Sales of LED products accounted for 74% and 67% of our revenue while sales of fiber optic lighting products accounted for 20% and 31% of our revenue for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The balance of the revenue mix consisted primarily of sales of water feature products.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was approximately $650,000, or 25% of revenue, as compared to approximately $1,226,000, or 32% of revenue, for the comparable period of 2008. Direct gross margin for the second quarter of 2009, which is revenue less material cost, decreased to approximately 51% as compared to 53% in the same period of 2008, due primarily to a shift in sales to lower margin products and our decision to increase third party manufacturing where production costs are incorporated into the purchased product.

Production costs decreased approximately $139,000 on significantly lower sales volume. Excluding the impact of Lumificient, we reduced production costs by approximately $257,000 to more closely match sales activity. The reduction in production costs reflects a decrease of $232,000 due primarily to a reduction in expedited freight costs. Offsetting the decrease in freight was a net change in capitalized labor, overhead and freight of $236,000, resulting from a release of capitalized labor, overhead and freight of $119,000 in the second quarter of 2009 compared to higher absorption of capitalized labor, overhead and freight of $117,000 in the second quarter of 2008. We also recorded $118,000 higher reserve expense in the second quarter of 2008, related to physical inventory inspections as compared to the same period in 2009.

Operating Loss

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were approximately $2,048,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as compared to approximately $2,420,000 for the same period in 2008, a decrease of approximately $372,000, or 15%. SG&A expenses decreased primarily due to the first quarter consolidation of the operations of our Advanced Lighting Systems subsidiary (ALS) into our SV Lighting Division, resulting in the elimination of SG&A costs totaling $232,000 incurred in the second quarter of 2008. In addition, SG&A expenses decreased due to a reduction in marketing costs of $106,000 and a reduction in commissions expense of $88,000. Offsetting these decreases was the addition of a full quarter of SG&A from Lumificient in the second quarter of 2009.

Research and development costs were approximately $130,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to approximately $170,000 during the same period in 2008. This decrease of approximately $40,000, or 23%, was primarily due to lower employee costs in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to the same period of 2008.

20

Table of Contents

Income Taxes

We have provided a full valuation allowance against income tax benefits resulting from losses incurred and accumulated on operations. As a result, there was no provision for income tax recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Net Loss

Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $1,557,000 and $1,335,000, respectively. After including the effects of the dividends related to the preferred stock and warrants issued in November 2008, net loss attributable to common stockholders was approximately $1,880,000 and $1,335,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Basic and diluted loss per common share attributable to common stockholders was $0.22 and $0.17 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Six months ended June 30, 2009 vs. 2008

Revenue and Gross Profit

Total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was approximately $5,642,000 as compared to approximately $6,863,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, a decrease of approximately $1,221,000. Revenue benefitted from the April 30, 2008 acquisition of Lumificient, which serves the commercial and signage lighting markets. Excluding revenue attributable to Lumificient from our consolidated results, revenue decreased to approximately $3,727,000 in the first six months of 2009 compared to approximately $6,205,000 in the same period of 2008.

Revenue from sales of commercial lighting products decreased by $696,000, or 16%, from approximately $4,344,000 in the first six months of 2008 to approximately $3,648,000 in the first six months of 2009. Excluding revenue attributable to Lumificient, our commercial product sales decreased $1,953,000, or 53%, in the first half of 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008, driven primarily by significant decreases in commercial construction activity across the US. Sales of our newly introduced Array™ LED lamps were approximately $290,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Revenue from sales of pool and spa lighting products was approximately $1,993,000 in the first half of 2009, as compared to $2,519,000 for the same period of 2008. Revenue decreased $526,000, or 21%, reflecting the continued significant year over year reductions in the pool and OEM spa markets tied to the steep drop in demand for luxury items related to the US recession.

Sales of LED products accounted for 74% and 64% of our revenue while sales of fiber optic lighting products accounted for 21% and 33% of our revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The balance of the revenue mix consisted primarily of sales of water feature products.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was approximately $1,705,000, or 30% of revenue, as compared to approximately $2,021,000, or 29% of revenue, for the comparable period of 2008. Direct gross margin for the first half of 2009, which is revenue less material cost, decreased to approximately 52% as compared to 54% in the same period of 2008, due primarily to a significant drop in sales of higher margin commercial products.

Production costs decreased approximately $434,000 on lower sales volume. This reduction in production costs reflects a decrease of approximately $253,000 in expedited freight costs, a decrease in labor costs of approximately $125,000 as a result of our shift in production to third party manufacturers, and a decrease of approximately $90,000 in production costs incurred at ALS due to the consolidation of the operations of our ALS subsidiary into our SV Lighting Division. In addition, we recorded higher reserve expense in the first six months of 2008, related to physical inventory inspections as compared to the same period in 2009. Offsetting these decreases was the addition of a full six months of production costs from Lumificient in 2009.

21

Table of Contents

Operating Loss

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were approximately $4,400,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to approximately $4,335,000 for the same period in 2008, an increase of approximately $65,000, or 2%. Excluding Lumificient which was acquired on April 30, 2008, our company reduced operating expenses by $407,000, including $344,000 of savings from consolidating the operations of our subsidiary, ALS, into Nexxus’ operations in March 2009.

Research and development costs were approximately $238,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to approximately $294,000 during the same period in 2008. This decrease of approximately $56,000, or 19%, was primarily due to lower employee and project costs in the first half of 2009 as compared to the same period of 2008.

Income Taxes

We have provided a full valuation allowance against income tax benefits resulting from losses incurred and accumulated on operations. As a result, there was no provision for income tax recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Net Loss

Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $2,959,000 and $2,577,000, respectively. After including the effects of the dividends related to the preferred stock and warrants issued in November 2008, net loss attributable to common stockholders was approximately $3,566,000 and $2,577,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Basic and diluted loss per common share attributable to common stockholders was $0.43 and $0.34 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2009 we had working capital of approximately $6,480,000, including cash and cash equivalents of $3,811,000, an increase of approximately 49% compared to working capital of approximately $4,363,000, including cash and cash equivalents of $2,949,000, at December 31, 2008. This increase in working capital was primarily due to an increase in cash and equivalents of $862,000, a decrease in accounts payable of $865,000, a decrease in accrued severance and lease termination costs of $570,000 and a decrease in the current portion of payable to related party under acquisition agreement of $397,000. These changes were partially offset by an increase in dividends payable of $338,000 and a decrease in accounts receivable of $624,000.

Net cash used in operations amounted to approximately $2,925,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $946,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. This $1,979,000 increase in net cash used in operating activities over the comparable period of 2008 is primarily due to a $2,258,000 increase in cash used for accounts payable in the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period of 2008. In addition, cash used for purchases of inventory was approximately $216,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to cash provided by inventories of approximately $147,000 over the comparable period of 2008, resulting in a $363,000 net increase of cash used for purchases of inventory compared to 2008. This inventory growth reflects our investment in new Array™ LED replacement lamps. Partially offsetting this use of cash was a $1,020,000 increase in cash provided by collections of accounts receivable for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period of 2008.

22

Table of Contents

Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was approximately $505,000 as compared to approximately $90,000 in the same period of 2008. This increase in cash used in investing activities of $415,000 is primarily the result of proceeds from the sale of investments of $2,875,000 in the first six months of 2008, offset by a decrease in cash used for acquisition costs and earnouts of $2,296,000 and a decrease in cash used for purchases of property and equipment of $180,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008

Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was approximately $4,292,000 as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $3,789,000 for the comparable period of 2008. Cash provided by financing activities increased $503,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009 as we used $1,443,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2008 to extinguish our line of credit. In addition, cash provided by proceeds from promissory notes was $3,800,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $3,500,000 over the comparable period of 2008, resulting in a $300,000 increase compared to 2008. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options and warrants of $1,222,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period of 2008.

Nexxus’ liquidity is affected by many factors. Some of these factors are based on operations of the business and others relate to the uncertainties of national and global economies and the lighting industry.

Our ability to maintain adequate liquidity and achieve long-term viability is dependent upon successfully managing our costs and expenses and increasing revenue. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain adequate liquidity or achieve long-term viability. Our ability to meet our obligations in the ordinary course of business is dependent upon our ability to establish profitable operations or raise additional capital through public or private debt or equity financing, or other sources of financing to fund operations. We face significant challenges in order to achieve profitability and there can be no assurance that we will achieve or sustain positive cash flows from operations or profitability. The disruption of the capital markets and the continued decline in economic conditions could negatively impact our ability to raise additional capital and, accordingly, we have developed a streamlined operating plan, which we intend to pursue unless and until additional capital becomes available on acceptable terms, if at all. Expectations of future cash needs and cash flows are subject to substantial uncertainty.

While the secured promissory notes issued in June 2009 and the preferred stock issued in November 2008 provided a significant amount of cash to our company, operating losses and the April 30, 2008 acquisition of Lumificient consumed a significant amount of our cash balances. In the event that we experience unforeseen increases in expenditures or should estimated revenues not materialize, these conditions could significantly impair our ability to fund future operations. If we are unable to maintain adequate liquidity, future operations will need to be scaled back. Accordingly, we have identified certain operating measures that can be taken to conserve liquidity if circumstances warrant. These measures could include further reductions in costs and re-timing or eliminating certain capital spending. However, in order to optimize the growth of our business, we will need to seek to raise additional debt or equity capital. As such, we are opportunistically considering public or private financing transactions, which may include credit facilities, such as term loans and unsecured or secured borrowings, and the sale of equity securities. There can be no assurance such financing will be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all, or that any financing transaction will not be dilutive to our current stockholders. We anticipate that any additional liquidity from such actions would be used for general corporate purposes including working capital needs as well as funding the cash requirements of any potential strategic acquisition. In addition, if we raise more than $5 million from the sale of equity securities, we must offer to redeem a specified percentage of our outstanding preferred stock, ranging from 30% to 100% if we raise $20 million or more.

Contractual Obligations

As of June 30, 2009, there have been no material changes to our contractual obligations disclosed in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, other than the Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement described below.

On June 18, 2009, we entered into a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the Note Purchase Agreement), with a limited number of accredited investors. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, we sold an aggregate of $3,800,000 in principal amount of secured promissory notes (the Notes) and 285,000 warrants (the Note Warrants) to purchase shares of our common stock. The Notes are payable in full on January 5, 2011 and incur simple interest at the rate of 10.0% per year. The interest is payable a year after the closing date and at maturity. The Notes are secured by all of our assets.

23

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

As of June 30, 2009, there have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies disclosed in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon Nexxus’ condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, income taxes, intangibles, accounts receivable, inventory, stock-based compensation and warranty obligations. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The critical accounting estimates are those that we believe are the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed financial statements. As of June 30, 2009, there have been no material changes to the critical accounting estimates as described in our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in the Notes to the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued Statement 141(R), “Business Combinations” (SFAS 141(R)), which applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses, including those sometimes referred to as “true mergers” or “mergers of equals” and combinations achieved without the transfer of consideration. This statement replaces FASB Statement No. 141 and applies to all business entities, including mutual entities that previously used the pooling-of-interests method of accounting for some business combinations. We adopted SFAS 141(R) beginning in 2009. The adoption of SFAS 141(R) will have an effect on our operating results with respect to future acquisitions, if any.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies” (FSP 141(R)-1), which amends and clarifies SFAS 141(R) to address application issues on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. FSP 141(R)-1 is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. We adopted FSP 141(R)-1 beginning in 2009. The adoption of FSP 141(R)-1 may have an effect on our operating results with respect to future acquisitions, if any.

In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13” (FSP 157-1). FSP 157-1 amends SFAS 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. In addition, on February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (FSP 157-2), which amends SFAS 157 by delaying its effective date by one year for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. This pronouncement was effective upon issuance. We have deferred the adoption of SFAS 157 with respect to all non-financial assets and liabilities in accordance with the provisions of this pronouncement. On January 1, 2009, SFAS 157 became applicable to all other fair value measurements for which the application was deferred under FSP 157-2. SFAS 157 did not have an impact on our assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements.

On October 10, 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (FSP 157-3). The FSP clarifies the application of FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. The FSP was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The provisions of FSP 157-3 did not have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

24

Table of Contents

In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (FSP 157-4), which provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS 157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. FSP 157-4 re-emphasizes that regardless of market conditions, the fair value measurement is an exit price concept as defined in SFAS 157, and clarifies and includes additional factors to consider in determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset or liability and provides additional clarification on estimating fair value when the market activity for an asset or liability has declined significantly. FSP 157-4 is applied prospectively to all fair value measurements where appropriate. We adopted the provisions of FSP 157-4 effective April 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP 157-4 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. It requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. We adopted SFAS 161 beginning in 2009. The adoption of SFAS 161 did not have an impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (FSP 142-3). This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. This FSP also adds certain disclosures to those already prescribed in SFAS 142. FSP 142-3 became effective on January 1, 2009. The guidance for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of the effective date. The adoption of FSP 142-3 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities”. The FSP concludes that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are participating securities under FASB Statement No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” and should be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that is used to determine earnings per share for each class of common stock according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. We adopted EITF 03-6-1 beginning in 2009. The adoption of EITF 03-6-1 did not have an impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In June 2008, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus regarding EITF Issue No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (EITF 07-5). EITF 07-5 outlines a two-step approach to evaluate the instrument’s contingent exercise provisions, if any, and to evaluate the instrument’s settlement provisions when determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The Company adopted EITF 07-5 beginning in 2009. The adoption of EITF 07-5 did not have an impact on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. SFAS 107-1 (FSP 107-1) and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (APB 28-1). FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 amend FASB Statement No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements and also amend Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting”, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. We adopted FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 upon issuance. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (FAS 165). FAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The new standard is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FAS 165 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standard Codification™ (“Codification”) and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. This statement replaces SFAS 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” and establishes the Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles used in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The Codification does not replace or affect guidance issued by the SEC or its staff. After the effective date of this statement, all non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will be superseded and deemed non-authoritative.

25

Table of Contents

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act 1934, as amended, and are not required to provide the information under this item.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), our company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three month period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

In the ordinary course of business we may become a party to various legal proceedings involving contractual matters, infringement actions, product liability claims and other matters. We are not currently a party to any pending legal proceedings.

At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 21, 2009, the following proposals were submitted to stockholders with the following results:

26

Table of Contents

No other matters were voted upon at the meeting.

27

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

28