1.	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Basis of presentation—The accompanying (a) condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and (b) the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”), have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not necessarily repeat disclosures that would substantially duplicate disclosures included in the annual audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 and details of accounts that have not changed significantly in amount or composition. In the opinion of management, they reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as of and for the dates and periods presented.

These unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes and other information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The results of operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending on December 31, 2015 or for any other future period.

Business—Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“the Company”, “we”, “our”, “us”) design, manufacture, market and sell commercial grade light-emitting diode (“LED”) and conventional lighting fixtures for outdoor and indoor applications, LED-based signage, channel-letter and contour lighting products, LED replacement lamps and high-performance, commercial grade smart grid control systems. We sell these products under the RVLT, Lumificient, Value Lighting, Array and CMG brand names. We are in the process of consolidating our Seesmart and Relume brand names under the RVLT umbrella. We believe that our product offerings and patented designs provide opportunities for significant savings in energy and maintenance costs without compromising the environment. We generate revenue by selling lighting products for use in the municipal and commercial markets, which include vertical markets such as industrial, commercial and government facilities, hospitality, institutional, educational, healthcare and signage markets. We market and distribute our products globally through networks of distributors, independent sales agencies and representatives, electrical supply companies, as well as internal marketing and sales forces.

The Company’s operations consist of one reportable segment for financial reporting purposes: Lighting Products and Solutions (principally LED fixtures and lamps). The two segments that were previously reported, Lighting Fixtures and Lamps and Lighting Signage and Media, have been aggregated into this reportable segment due to changes in the management and organizational structure and internal reporting. Prior period financial segment information has been combined to conform to the current period presentation.

Liquidity—At June 30, 2015, the Company had cash of $0.5 million and working capital of $28.0 million, compared to cash of $6.0 million and working capital of $18.8 million at December 31, 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company used cash for operations of $13.9 million and $7.9 million, respectively.

In August 2014, the Company entered into a three-year loan and security agreement with Bank of America to borrow up to $25 million on a revolving basis based upon specified percentages of eligible receivables and inventory (“the Revolving Credit Facility”). In April 2015, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer guaranteed $5 million of borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, enabling us to borrow up to $5 million in addition to the amount that is based upon receivables and inventory. This guarantee may be terminated under certain circumstances on December 31, 2015. As of June 30, 2015, the balance on the Revolving Credit Facility was $17.9 million, with additional borrowing capacity of $2.4 million. We are in compliance with our covenants and obligations under the revolving credit facility.

In December 2014, we exchanged all outstanding series of preferred stock, including accrued but unpaid dividends thereon, to an aggregate of 36,300,171 shares of our common stock (the “Preferred Stock Exchange”). All rights relating to the preferred stock were extinguished as a result of the transaction, accordingly, we have been relieved of the ongoing obligation to pay dividends on preferred stock.

Historically, the Company’s controlling shareholder, RVL 1 LLC (“RVL”), and its affiliates have been a significant source of financing, as they continue to support our operations.

The Company believes it has adequate resources to meet its cash requirements in the foreseeable future.

Principles of consolidation—The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

 

Use of estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates relate to valuation of accounts receivable and inventories, warranty obligations, purchase price allocation of acquired businesses, contingent consideration, impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, valuation of financial instruments, income taxes, and contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue recognition—The Company recognizes revenue for its products upon shipment or delivery to customers in accordance with the respective contractual arrangements, provided no significant obligations remain and collection is probable. For sales that include customer acceptance terms, revenue is recorded after customer acceptance. It is the Company’s policy that all sales are final. Requests for returns are reviewed on a case-by-case basis. As revenue is recorded, the Company accrues an estimated amount for product returns as a reduction of revenue.

The Company from time to time enters into multiple element arrangements, primarily the delivery of products and installation services. The Company allocates the sales value to each element based on its best estimate of the selling price and recognizes revenues in accordance with the relevant standard for each element.

The Company records sales tax revenue on a gross basis (included in revenues and costs). For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, revenues from sales taxes were $1.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

Warranties and product liability—The Company’s LED products typically carry a warranty that ranges from one to ten years and includes replacement of defective parts. A warranty reserve is recorded for the estimated costs associated with warranty expense related to recorded sales, which is included within accrued liabilities. Changes in the Company’s warranty liability for the six months ended June 30, 2015 are as follows:

 

(in thousands)		2015
Warranty liability, January 1		$	443
Provision for current period			92
Current period claims			(67	)
Warranty liability, June 30		$	468

Fair value measurements—The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of the balance sheet dates. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The respective carrying value of certain Level 1 balance sheet financial instruments approximates its fair value. These financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, related party payables, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings. Fair values were estimated to approximate carrying values for these financial instruments since they are short term in nature and they are receivable or payable on demand.

Based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for bank loans with similar terms and average maturities (Level 2 inputs), the fair value of borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility are equal to the carrying value (see Note 5).

The Company determines the fair value of purchase price obligations on a recurring basis based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow analysis and Monte Carlo simulation. The fair value remeasurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in the fair value hierarchy. In each period, the Company reassesses its current estimates of performance relative to the stated targets and adjusts the liability to fair value. Any such adjustments are included as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Changes in the fair value of purchase price obligations during the six months ended June 30, 2015 were as follows:

 

(in thousands)		2015
Fair value, January 1		$	12,355
Fair value of acquisition liabilities paid during the period			(6,047	)
Fair value of consideration issued			500
Change in fair value			485
Fair value, June 30		$	7,293

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements as of June 30, 2015:

 

(in thousands)		Fair Value at June 30, 2015				Valuation Technique		Unobservable Inputs
Earnout liabilities		$	5,213			Income approach		Discount rate -15.5%
Stock distribution price floor			1,580			Monte Carlo simulation		Volatility - 115%
								Risk free rate - 0.98%
								Dividend yield - 0%
Time based payments			500			Expected payments		None
Fair value, June 30, 2015		$	7,293

Cash equivalents—Temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Accounts receivable—Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of certain customers and specifically identified amounts that it believes to be uncollectible. Recovery of bad debt amounts previously written off is recorded as a reduction of bad debt expense in the period the payment is collected. If the Company’s actual collection experience changes, revisions to its allowance may be required. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. The following summarizes the changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the six months ended June 30, 2015:

 

(in thousands)		2015
Allowance for doubtful accounts, January 1		$	516
Additions			455
Write-offs			(124	)
Allowance for doubtful accounts, June 30		$	847

Inventories—Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. A reserve is recorded for any inventory deemed excessive or obsolete.

Property and equipment—Property and equipment are stated at cost or the estimated fair value if acquired as part of a business combination. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method and is charged to operations over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. The carrying amount and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts in the year of disposal and any resulting gain or loss is included in results of operations. The estimated useful lives of property and equipment are as follows:

 

		Estimated useful lives
Machinery and equipment		3-7 years
Furniture and fixtures		5-7 years
Computers and software		3-7 years
Motor vehicles		5 years
Leasehold improvements		Lesser of lease term or estimated useful life

Intangible assets and goodwill—Identifiable intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives (between 1 and 17.5 years).

Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to annual impairment testing unless circumstances dictate more frequent assessments. The Company performs an annual impairment assessment for goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year and more frequently whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of the asset may be less than the carrying amount. Goodwill impairment testing is judgmental in nature and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates, strategic plans and future market conditions, among others. There can be no assurance that the Company’s estimates and assumptions made for purposes of the goodwill impairment testing will prove to be accurate predictions of the future.

Long-lived assets—The Company evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances have indicated that an asset may not be recoverable. The long-lived asset is grouped with other assets at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets are written down to the estimated fair value.

Deferred rent—The Company accounts for certain operating leases containing predetermined fixed increases of the base rental rate during the lease term as rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company has reported the difference between the amounts charged to operations and amounts payable under the leases as a liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Shipping and handling costs—Shipping and handling costs related to the acquisition of goods from vendors are included in cost of sales.

Research and development—Research and development costs to develop new products are charged to expense as incurred.

Advertising—Advertising costs, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, are expensed when the advertising first takes place. The Company promotes its product lines primarily through print media and trade shows, including trade publications, and promotional brochures. Advertising expenses were not material during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

Income taxes— Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes resulting from temporary differences. Such temporary differences result from differences in the carrying value of assets and liabilities for tax and financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax consequences of those differences, which will be either taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized, and the Company has provided a full valuation allowance related to net deferred tax assets and income tax benefits resulting from losses incurred and accumulated on operations (“NOLs”).

In connection with the acquisition of Value Lighting in 2014, the Company recorded net deferred tax liabilities of approximately $6.0 million, primarily resulting from the recognition of amortizable intangible assets at the date of acquisition. These net deferred tax credits can be used to reduce net deferred tax assets for which the Company had provided a valuation allowance. Accordingly, the valuation allowance was reduced by a corresponding amount during the three months ended June 30, 2014.

Stock-based compensation—The Company recognizes the cost of employee or director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments in the financial statements, which is measured based on the grant date fair value of the award. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period.

The Company values restricted stock awards to employees at the quoted market price on the grant date. The Company estimates the fair value of option awards issued under its stock option plans on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model that uses the assumptions noted below. The Company estimates the volatility of its common stock at the date of grant based on the historical volatility of its common stock. The Company determines the expected life based on historical experience with similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and post-vesting forfeitures. For shares that vest contingent upon achievement of certain performance criteria, an estimate of the probability of achievement is applied in the estimate of fair value. If the goals are not met, no compensation cost is recognized and any previously recognized compensation cost is reversed. The Company bases the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with an equivalent remaining term approximately equal to the expected life of the award. The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The Company from time to time enters into arrangements with non-employee service providers pursuant to which it issues restricted stock vesting over specified periods for time-based services. These arrangements are accounted for under the provisions of FASB ASC 505-50 “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees”. Pursuant to this standard, the restricted stock is valued at the quoted price at the date of vesting. Prior to vesting, compensation is recorded on a cumulative basis based on the quoted market price at the end of the reporting period.

Loss per share—Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted shares and the conversion of outstanding convertible securities. In periods in which a net loss has been incurred, all potentially dilutive common shares are considered anti-dilutive and thus are excluded from the calculation.

In connection with the 2014 acquisitions (see Note 2), the Company is unconditionally obligated to issue an additional 5,059,334 shares of its common stock during 2015, 2016 and 2017. These potentially dilutive shares have been included in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Also in connection with the 2014 acquisitions, the Company is contingently obligated to pay up to $6.2 million, or at its option, an equivalent amount of common shares based upon their then-current market value, if certain performance criteria have been met. These shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2015 because the effect would be antidilutive.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company had 20.5 million common equivalent shares which may have been issuable, primarily pursuant to convertible securities, which were not included in the computation of loss per share at June 30, 2014 because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, excluded common equivalent shares amounted to 0.3 million.

Contingencies—In the ordinary course of business, the Company may become a party to various legal proceedings generally involving contractual matters, infringement actions, product liability claims and other matters. The Company evaluates such matters in accordance with the criteria set forth in FASB ASC 450. Based upon such evaluation, at June 30, 2015, the Company is not a party to any pending legal proceedings that it believes to be material.

Recent accounting pronouncements—In May 2014, the FASB issued the standard “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which supersedes existing revenue recognition standards including most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance. In April 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of the standard, making it effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted on or after December 15, 2016. At this time, the Company has not determined the effect that this accounting pronouncement will have on its financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, “Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items” (Subtopic 225-20), which eliminates the accounting concept of extraordinary items for periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis”, which modifies the criteria for evaluating whether certain legal entities should be consolidated. The provisions of the ASU are effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2015, however earlier adoption is permitted. The Company has adopted the ASU effective January 1, 2015, without material effect on its consolidated financial statements.