Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-QSB

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File No. 0-23590

SUPER VISION INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in Its Charter)

8210 Presidents Drive

Orlando, Florida 32809

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(407) 857-9900

(Issuer’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Not Applicable

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:  Yes  x    No  ¨

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format  Yes  ¨    No  x

Table of Contents

Super Vision International, Inc.

Index to Form 10-QSB

Table of Contents

Super Vision International, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

Super Vision International, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations – unaudited

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

Super Vision International, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – unaudited

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

Super Vision International, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Business - Super Vision International, Inc. (the “Company”) is engaged in the design, manufacture and marketing of LED lighting products, signs and displays, SIDE-GLOW^® and END GLOW^® fiber optic lighting cables, light sources and “point-to-point” fiber optic signs and displays. The Company’s products have a wide variety of applications in the signage, swimming pool, architectural, advertising and retail industries.

Basis of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Super Vision International, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Oasis Waterfalls, LLC (collectively, the “Company”). All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. Effective May 31, 2003, Oasis Waterfalls LLC was merged with and into Super Vision International, Inc.

Revenue Recognition - Generally, the Company recognizes revenue for its products upon delivery to customers, provided no significant obligations remain and collection is probable.

Cash Equivalents - Temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Accounts receivable - Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms. The Company performs continuing credit evaluations of their customers’ financial condition. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on specifically identified amounts that it believes to be uncollectible. The Company also records an additional allowance based on certain percentages of its aged receivables, which are determined based on historical experience and its assessment of the general financial conditions affecting its customer base. If its actual collection experience changes, revisions to its allowance may be required. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance.

Investments - Marketable equity securities and debt securities are classified either as available-for-sale or held to maturity. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in a separate component of shareholders’ equity. The amortized costs of debt securities in this category are adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization is included in investment income. Unrealized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in investment income. The costs of securities sold are based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in investment income. The Company accounts for investments in debt securities as held-to-maturity and records the investments at amortized cost when the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold those securities to maturity. The held-to-maturity securities were corporate bonds that matured in January 2003 and earned interest at the rate of 5.875% per annum.

The amortized costs, unrealized gains or losses, and estimated fair values of the Company’s investments held at September 30, 2003 are summarized as follows:

4

Table of Contents

Super Vision International, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) - Continued

Recent accounting pronouncements - In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred. SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The application of the requirements of SFAS 146 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position or result of operations.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—an Amendment to SFAS 123.” SFAS 148 provides two additional transition methods for entities that adopt the preferable method of accounting for stock based compensation. Further, the statement requires disclosure of comparable information for all companies regardless of whether, when, or how an entity adopts the preferable, fair value based method of accounting. These disclosures are now required for interim periods in addition to the traditional annual disclosure. The amendments to SFAS 123, which provides for additional transition methods, are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002, although earlier application is permitted. The amendments to the disclosure requirements are required for financial reports containing condensed financial statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 during the interim period ended March 31, 2003. The Company has not yet determined in what manner or when it will adopt the fair value methodology of SFAS 148.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” The Statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures in its statement of financial position certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances) because that financial instrument embodies an obligation of the issuer. Many of such instruments were previously classified as equity. The statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, except for mandatory redeemable financial instruments of nonpublic entities. The Statement is to be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance of the date of the Statement and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. Restatement is not permitted. Management believes that the adoption of this Statement will not have a significant impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” which clarifies disclosure and recognition/measurement requirements related to certain guarantees. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements issued after December 15, 2002 and the recognition/measurement requirements are effective on a prospective basis for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The application of the requirements of FIN 45 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position or result of operations.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” FIN 46 clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is applicable immediately for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. For variable interest entities created prior to January 31, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 are applicable no later than July 1, 2003. The Company has not identified any variable interest entities and does not expect FIN 46 to have any effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications - Certain items in the financial statements of prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

5

Table of Contents

Super Vision International, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) - Continued

Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (average cost), or market. Provision is made for any inventory deemed excessive or obsolete.

Property and equipment - Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method and is charged to operations over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives of the Company’s property and equipment range from 3 to 20 years. Property held under capital lease is amortized over the life of the lease. Related amortization expense is included with depreciation in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and accumulated depreciation in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. The carrying amount and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts in the year of disposal and any resulting gain or loss is included in results of operations.

Intangible assets and goodwill - In accordance with SFAS No.142, the Company has performed an annual review of valuations of all goodwill and intangible assets as of December 31, 2002 and has determined that there were no instances of impairment in the goodwill and intangible assets in its reporting units. The Company will continue to test annually for impairment in the fourth quarter unless there are indications during an interim period that goodwill and intangible assets may have become impaired.

Patents and trademarks are amortized using the straight-line method over their useful lives which range from 12 to 17 years.

Long lived assets - The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” based on expected undiscounted cash flows and will recognize impairment of the carrying value of long-lived assets, if any is indicated, based on the fair value of such assets. No impairment losses have been recognized in any of the periods presented.

Research and development - Research and development costs to develop new products are charged to expense as incurred.

Advertising - Advertising costs, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, are expensed when the advertising first takes place. The Company promotes its product lines primarily through print media. Such media includes trade publications, trade shows and promotional brochures. Advertising expenses were approximately $188,000 and $269,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Income taxes - Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes resulting from temporary differences. Such temporary differences result from differences in the carrying value of assets and liabilities for tax and financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Earnings per share - Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares may consist of incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, adjusted for the assumed repurchase of the Company’s common stock, at the average market price, from the exercise proceeds and also may include incremental shares issuable in connection with convertible securities. In periods in which a net loss has been incurred, all potentially dilutive common shares are considered antidilutive and thus are excluded from the calculation.

6

Table of Contents

Super Vision International, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) - Continued

Stock-based compensation - The Company accounts for its stock-based employee compensation plans under the accounting provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and has furnished the pro forma disclosures required under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure.

The Company applies the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, but applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its plans. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for stock options granted under the plans. If the Company had elected to recognize compensation expense for stock options based on the fair value at grant date, consistent with the method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, net loss and loss per share would have been increased to the pro forma amounts shown below:

These pro forma amounts were determined using the Black-Scholes Valuation model with the following key assumptions: (a) an average discount rate of 6%; (b) a volatility factor of approximately 53% and 44% for 2003 and 2002, respectively, based upon volatility of a comparable group of companies; and (c) an average expected option life of 7 years through the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002.

Comprehensive Income - Pursuant to SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” the Company is required to report comprehensive income and its components in its financial statements, which includes unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities.

Business Segments - Pursuant to SFAS No. 131, “Disclosure about Segments of a Business Enterprise and Related Information,” the Company is required to report segment information. As the Company only operates in principally one business segment, no additional reporting is required.

7

Table of Contents

Super Vision International, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) - Continued

Inventories consist of the following:

The Company leases its operating facility from a corporation owned by the Company’s chief executive officer. The lease has a fifteen-year term extending through June 15, 2012. Assets recorded under this capital lease and included in property and equipment are as follows:

Future minimum annual lease payments for the remainder of 2003 and years subsequent thereto in the aggregate are as follows:

Deposits paid under this lease agreement totaled $59,167 at September 30, 2003.

8

Table of Contents

Super Vision International, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) - Continued

The Company adopted a stock option plan that provides for the grant of incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options, and reserved 450,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock for future issuance under the plan. The option price must be at least 100% of market value at the date of the grant and the options have a maximum term of 10 years.

The following table summarizes activity of the stock option plan for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2003:

Options granted typically vest ratably over a three-year period or vest based on achievement of performance criteria. As of September 30, 2003, shares of Class A common stock options totaling 234,571 were vested and exercisable under this plan. The Board of Directors has determined that no new options will be granted under this plan.

On September 18, 2003, the Company adopted a new stock option plan that provides for the grant of incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options, and reserved 450,000 additional shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock for future issuance under the plan. The option price must be at least 100% of market value at the date of the grant and options have a maximum term of 10 years.

The following table summarizes activity of the stock option plan for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2003:

Options granted typically vest ratably over a three-year period or vest based on achievement of performance criteria. As of September 30, 2003, there were no shares of Class A common stock options vested and exercisable under this newly-adopted plan.

9

Table of Contents

Super Vision International, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) - Continued

The following is a reconciliation of basic net earnings (loss) per share to diluted net earnings (loss) per share:

Employee stock options and certain outstanding warrants are not included in the computation of earnings and loss per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 because the related shares are contingently issuable or to do so would have been anti-dilutive. At September 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company had 824,630 and 756,496 potentially dilutive common shares, respectively.

10

Table of Contents

Super Vision International, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) - Continued

On November 18, 1999 the Company filed a lawsuit (case number CI 99-9392) in the Circuit Court of the 9^th Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County Florida against Jack Caruso, Samson Mong Wu, Susan Sumida Wu, Debbie Wu, Thomas Wu, Lily Cheung, Ruby Lee, James C. Lee, Tony Lee, Optic-Tech International Corporation, Shanghai Qiaolong Optic-Tech International Company, Ltd., Marsam Trading Corporation, Marsam Trading Corporation (HK) Ltd., David Winkler, Gitto/Global Corp., James J. Grimley, Nick Semenza, Rami Yosefian, Sanford Properties, Inc., Jose Rosario Cruz, Ronald Elgin Simon, and Travis Pochintesta (the “Wu Defendants”).

Three of the Wu Defendants, Gitto/Global Corporation, Nick Semenza and James Grimely were dismissed from the litigation. On September 6, 2002, the Company entered into a settlement agreement and mutual release with defendants Rami Yosefian and Sanford Properties, Inc. As part of this settlement, Rami Yosefian and Sanford Properties paid the Company $50,000. In addition the Company received proceeds from its own insurance coverage in the amount of $15,000, which has been recorded as an offset to legal expense.

On September 26, 2002, the Company was awarded a jury verdict in the amount of $33,100,000. This jury award was comprised of $2,700,000 for civil theft against six of the defendants, $3,400,000 in compensatory damages against all of the defendants, and a total of $27,000,000 in punitive damages. The court also determined that upon entry of final judgment, the Company is entitled to its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to the civil theft statute and the trade secret statute. Final judgment was entered against the remaining defendants on June 16, 2003. The defendants have filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment and pleadings are pending. The Company has commenced collection efforts. The Company believes that the monetary judgment will be very difficult and costly to collect, if it is collectable at all. The Company may not be successful in collecting any of the amounts awarded by the Court and therefore has not recorded any provision in its statement of operations related to this judgment.

On June 16, 2003, the Company was granted a permanent injunction against the remaining defendants. The court ordered the release to the Company of all fiber optic inventories which were previously stored in the defendants Florida warehouses. Certain goods claimed in connection with the injunction are currently manufactured by the Company and were recorded at the current market price in inventory of approximately $48,000, with an offset to other income for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

On March 4, 2002, the Company filed a lawsuit (case number 6:02-CV-270-ORL-19JGG ) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida against Color Kinetics Incorporated (“Color Kinetics”). This is an action for declaratory judgment that certain patents of Color Kinetics are invalid, that the Company’s products do not infringe any of such patents, and that such patents are unenforceable. This action also includes claims for monetary damages for interference with prospective business relationships, unfair competition and trade disparagement under the Lanham Act and common law defamation. On June 6, 2002, Color Kinetics filed a patent infringement suit against Super Vision in Massachusetts alleging that certain Company products infringe certain of Color Kinetics’ patents for LED lighting systems. The Court in Florida has entered an order transferring the Florida case to the Massachusetts Court (case number 02-cv-11137-MEL) in the District Court of Massachusetts. The Company intends to vigorously pursue its claims in this matter and defend itself against Color Kinetics’ allegations. The Company is also considering bringing an anti-trust action claiming violations of the Lanham Act against Color Kinetics in concert with several other manufacturers in the United States and Europe.

On January 11, 2002, Super Vision filed a lawsuit (Case number CI 02-393) against Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, P.A., Brian R. Gilchrist, Esq., Jeffrey S. Whittle, Esq., and Rothwell Figg Ernst & Manbeck, P.C. in the 9^th Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County Florida alleging that the defendants aided and abetted certain of the Wu Defendants in the theft of the Company’s trade secrets, fraud, violations of Florida’s RICO Act, negligent destruction of evidence and civil theft. The Company has alleged that the defendants in this lawsuit represented certain of the Wu Defendants and their enterprises in the filing of trade secret information belonging to Super Vision in order to obtain U.S. Patents on their client’s behalf.

On July 18, 2003 Super Vision filed a lawsuit (civil case number CI 99-932) against impleader defendant, Ocean Bank of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida (the “Bank”) in the Circuit Court of the 9^th Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County Florida. The suit alleges that the Bank aided and abetted the efforts of Marsam Trading Corporation, Optic Tech International and the Wu Family of Shanghai, Hong Kong and Miami to avoid the enforcement of a court ordered injunction and the collection of a $33.1 million judgment and additional legal fees awarded to Super Vision in September of 2002 by an Orange County Jury in State civil proceedings under civil case number CI 99-9392. The Wu Family and their numerous associated corporations in the U.S. and China were found liable on more than twelve counts in that lawsuit including Theft of Trade Secrets, Fraud, Violations of Florida’s RICO Act, Negligent Destruction of Evidence and Civil Theft as described in a partial final judgment dated October 30, 2002 under the above case number. A separate criminal case has been under investigation by the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s Office. Super Vision has received testimony and affidavits that suggest the Bank may have liability for its actions with certain of the Wu Defendants.

11

Table of Contents

In July of 2003 Super Vision filed suit against Schiederwerk AG of Frankfurt, Germany in Federal Court in Orlando, Florida (case number 6: 03-CV-727-ORL-18-JGG) alleging that Schiederwerk is liable for costs and expenses in excess of $285,000 required to replace numerous shipments of electronic power supplies that resulted in repeated failure. The Company is currently in discussions with Schiederwerk to determine if further litigation can be avoided.

12

Table of Contents

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Condensed Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report, and the audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002.

The following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe-harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, the attainment of which involve various risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “plan”, “believe”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “continue”, “predict”, “forecast”, “intend”, “potential”, or similar terms, variations of those terms or the negative of those terms. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements due to, among other factors, competition in each of the Company’s product areas, dependence on suppliers, the Company’s limited manufacturing experience, the condition of the international marketplace and the evolving nature of the Company’s fiber optic and LED lighting technology. Additional information concerning these or other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained or projected in, or even implied by, such forward-looking statements is contained in this report and also from time to time in the Company’s other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. Readers should carefully review the risk factors described in other documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002. Although the Company believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking information will prove to be accurate. Neither the Company nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these forward-looking statements. The Company is under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report on Form 10-QSB to conform its prior statements to actual results.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 vs. 2002

Results of Operations

The Company derives its revenues primarily from sales of SIDE-GLOW^® and END-GLOW^® fiber optic lighting cables, fiber optic lighting sources, accessories, endpoint signs and displays and LED lighting systems. The Company also designs, markets and sells fiber optically lit waterfalls and water features. Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2003 were approximately $2,932,000 as compared to approximately $3,005,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002, a decrease of approximately $73,000 or 2%. The decrease was primarily the result of lower domestic sales of our products in the architecture & lighting, national accounts, pool & spa, and signs markets of approximately $181,000, $76,000, $34,000 and $18,000, respectively. We believe a soft economy and increased competition attributed to the decline in sales. The decrease was offset in part by the increase in sales of our products in the international market of approximately $232,000 primarily as a result of market expansion in countries where little or no representation previously existed and more focused sales effort by our international sales team. The decrease was further offset by an increase in other income of approximately $4,000. The source of other income comes from collection of finance charges on delinquent accounts receivable amounts.

Gross margin for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 was approximately $1,424,000 or 49% as compared to approximately $1,158,000 or 39% for the quarter ended September 30, 2002. Gross margin is dependent, in part, on product mix, as well as the mix of customers, which fluctuates from time to time. The increase in gross margin percent primarily resulted from lower variable production costs such as direct materials due to better pricing negotiations with our existing vendors and lower freight charges as a result of more effective purchasing and inventory management.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately $1,069,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2003 as compared to approximately $1,286,000 for the same period in 2002, a decrease of approximately $217,000 or 17%. The decrease was principally due to decreases in legal fees, advertising and promotional expenses, bad debt, consulting costs, royalty charges and travel costs of approximately $109,000, $60,000, $33,000, $29,000, $29,000 and $10,000 respectively. The decline in legal fees is attributable to the decline in legal activities in relation to the lawsuit the Company filed (case number CI 99-9392) in the Circuit Court of the 9^th Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County Florida against the Wu Defendants which resulted in the award of a jury verdict in the amount of $33.1 million on September 26, 2002 as previously stated in note 6 of the financial statements. Bad debt expense declined as a result of more focused collection efforts and a tighter front-end credit review process. Royalty payments are based on revenues from the sale of certain fiber optic and LED products. The decline in revenue during the quarter ended September 30, 2003 resulted in a decline in royalty payments. The decline in advertising and promotional expenses, consulting costs and travel costs can be attributed to management’s continued cost reduction initiatives. The decreases were offset by increases in sales labor and fringe benefit costs as well as commission expenses of approximately $20,000 and $39,000, respectively. These increases are due to increased hiring activities to fill key positions in order to provide continuing improved service to our customers as well an increase in sales subject to commission payments in the pool & spa market. The Company currently expects that selling, general and administrative expenses will continue to decrease as management focuses on long-term initiatives to lower expenses and implement process improvements in both selling and administrative functions.

Research and development costs were approximately $88,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2003 as compared to approximately $125,000 during the same period in 2002. The decrease was primarily due to more focused product development efforts, and decreases in labor and fringe benefit expenses, consulting costs, and travel expenses of approximately $17,000, $9,000, and $4,000 respectively.

Interest expense of approximately $101,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as compared to approximately $105,000 for the same period in 2002, relates to the capital lease for the Company’s facility in Orlando, Florida.

Other income was approximately $47,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2003 compared to approximately $44,000 for the same period in 2002. The source of other income was primarily from rental income from subleasing activities of excess warehouse capacity.

The Company has provided a full valuation allowance against income tax benefits resulting from losses incurred on operations and as a result there was no provision for income tax during the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

13

Table of Contents

The net income for the three months ended September 30, 2003 was approximately $206,000 or $0.08 per basic and diluted common share, as compared to a net loss of approximately $300,000, or $0.12 per basic and diluted common share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2002. This improvement in net income is primarily a result of management initiatives commenced in the latter part of the first quarter of 2003. Initiatives focused on operational cost reductions and improving product quality standards resulted in reducing warranty costs predominantly during the quarter ended September 30, 2002.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 vs. 2002

Results of Operations

Total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 were approximately $7,918,000 as compared to approximately $9,296,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 a decrease of approximately $1,378,000 or 15%. The decrease was primarily the result of lower domestic sales of our products across the architecture & lighting, our national accounts, pool & spa, and signs markets of approximately $597,000, $545,000, $458,000 and $267,000, respectively. We believe a soft economy and increased competition attributed to the decline in sales. This decrease was offset in part by the $469,000 increase in sales of our products in the international market primarily as a result of market expansion in countries where little or no representation previously existed and more focused sales efforts by our international sales team. The decrease was further offset by a $19,000 increase in other income as a result of collections of finance charges on delinquent accounts receivable amounts.

Gross margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was approximately $3,406,000 or 43% as compared to approximately $3,587,000 or 39% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The gross margin is dependent, in part, on product mix, as well as the mix of customers, which fluctuates from time to time. The increase in gross margin percent was mainly due to reductions in certain fixed production costs such as payroll as a result of cost cutting initiatives taken towards the latter part of first quarter of 2003, lower variable production expenses such as direct materials due to better pricing negotiations with our existing vendors, lower warranty expenses and freight in costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately $3,149,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 as compared to approximately $3,765,000 for the same period in 2002, a decrease of approximately $616,000 or 16%. The decrease was principally due to decreases in commission expense of $128,000 as a result of the decline in sales. In addition, the Company’s legal expenses declined approximately $133,000 due to significantly reduced legal activities relating to the lawsuit the Company filed (case number CI 99-9392) in the Circuit Court of the 9^th Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County Florida against the Wu Defendants which resulted in the award of a jury verdict in the amount of $33.1 million on September 26, 2002 as previously stated in note 6 of the financial statements. Bad debt expense declined $81,000 as a result of more focused collection efforts and a tighter front-end credit review process. Royalty payments are based on revenues from the sale of certain fiber optic and LED products. The decline in revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 resulted in a decline in royalty payments of approximately $52,000. Decreases of approximately $136,000 and $51,000 in advertising and promotional expenses and travel costs are attributable to management’s continued cost reduction initiatives. The Company currently expects that selling, general and administrative expenses will continue to decrease as management focuses on long-term measures to lower expenses and implement operational improvements in both selling and administrative functions.

Research and development costs were approximately $305,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 as compared to approximately $357,000 for the same period in 2002. The decrease in research and development expense is related to decreases in direct material and labor and fringe benefit costs of approximately $21,000 and $25,000, respectively.

Interest expense of approximately $307,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to approximately $317,000 for the same period last year, relates to the capital lease for the Company’s facility in Orlando, Florida.

Other income was approximately $215,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 compared to approximately $104,000 for the same period in 2002. The increase was primarily due to approximately $143,000 of income from subleasing excess capacity during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 compared to approximately $106,000 for the same period in 2002. Other income also included the current market value of inventory claimed from a court ordered release of all fiber optic lighting products held in warehouses of certain defendants named in a lawsuit filed by the Company on November 18, 1999 (case number CI-99-9392). Certain goods claimed in the injunction are currently manufactured by the Company and were recorded at the Company’s current cost in inventory of approximately $48,000 with an offset to other income during the nine months ended September, 30, 2003.

The Company has provided a full valuation allowance against income tax benefits resulting from losses incurred on operations and as a result there was no provision for income tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 or 2002.

The net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was approximately $120,000, or $0.05 per basic and diluted common share, as compared to net loss of approximately $696,000, or $0.27 per basic and diluted common share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002.

14

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At September 30, 2003 the Company had working capital of approximately of $4,739,000, an increase of approximately 5% as compared to working capital of approximately $4,525,000 at December 31, 2002. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company financed its operations primarily from working capital and cash on hand.

Net cash provided by operations amounted to approximately $537,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 as compared to approximately $213,000 provided by operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The most significant use of cash was generated by the decrease in accounts payable of approximately $985,000 due to the timing of payments to suppliers. The timing of payroll and the delivery of products and services to customers accounted for most of the use of cash reflected in the decrease in accrued compensation and benefits and customer deposits of approximately $43,000 and $18,000, respectively. Cash used in operating activities was offset by decreases in accounts receivable, inventory and other assets of approximately $376,000, $823,000 and $18,000, respectively. The decrease in accounts receivable was due to the timing of customer payments and increased collection efforts. The decrease in inventory was primarily due to the implementation of certain control measures. Control measures have been implemented to maintain inventory at levels designed to balance competitive lead-time with the risk of inventory obsolescence due to changing technology and customer requirements.

Net cash provided by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 amounted to approximately $430,000. The source of cash was primarily related to the held-to-maturity investment that matured in January 2003 as well as proceeds from disposal of equipment of approximately $546,000 and $19,000, respectively. Capital expenditures of approximately $114,000, account for most of the use of cash in investing activities. The Company also reinvested interest and dividend income of approximately $19,000 in a fixed income mutual fund during the nine months ended September 30, 2003.

Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was approximately $84,000. Payments on the capital lease obligation for the Company’s facility were approximately $85,000.

We currently believe that existing cash and cash equivalents balances and short-term investments will provide us with sufficient funds to finance our operations for the next 12 months. We intend to continue to invest in the development of new products and enhancements to our existing products. Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including without limitation, general economic conditions and conditions in the architectural lighting and pool and spa markets in particular, the level and timing of revenue, the costs and timing of our product development efforts and the success of these development efforts, our ability to reduce expenses to compensate for delays or decreases in revenues, the costs and timing of our sales and marketing activities, the extent to which our existing and new products gain market acceptance, competing technological and market developments, the costs involved in maintaining and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights, and other factors, all of which impact our ability to achieve and maintain profitability.

If we fail to achieve our plan of generating positive cash flow from operations over the next 12 months, we may not be able to devote as much resources as anticipated to developing or enhancing our products, taking advantage of future opportunities, or responding to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements, which could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Related Party Transactions and Contractual Obligations

On September 27, 1996, we entered into a lease agreement with Max King Realty, an entity controlled by Mr. Kingstone, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, for approximately 70,000 square feet of warehouse and office space. We began occupying this facility in August 1997. The lease term expires in June 2012. Rental payments for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 amounted to approximately $468,000 and $458,000, respectively. The lease agreement was approved by all of the disinterested directors of Super Vision, with Mr. Kingstone abstaining from the vote. At the time we entered into the lease agreement, based on then current economic conditions, the real estate market, and our prospects, we believed that the transaction was on terms, when taken as a whole, no less favorable to Super Vision than could generally be obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

Future minimum annual lease payments for the remainder of 2003 and years subsequent thereto in the aggregate are as follows:

On November 18, 1999, the Company filed a lawsuit (case number CI-99-9392) (the “Lawsuit”) in the Circuit Court of the 9^th Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County Florida against various defendants (the “Wu Defendants”). The Company is also pursuing litigation against certain parties related to the Wu Defendants (the “Related Litigation”). In September 2002, the Company was awarded a jury verdict of $33,100,000 in the Lawsuit. The Company believes that the monetary judgment awarded in the Lawsuit, and any amounts that may be awarded in the Related Litigation, will be very difficult and costly to collect, if collectable at all. The Company may not be successful in collecting any amounts awarded in the Lawsuit or that may be awarded in the Related Litigation. The Board of Directors of the Company has elected not to use Company funds to pursue collection activities in the Lawsuit or Related Litigation (the “Collection Activities”). The Company has reached an agreement with Mr. Kingstone regarding funding for Collection Activities. Mr. Kingstone has the option of providing personal funds (“Kingstone Funds”), or arranging for funds from third parties (“Third Party Funds”), to pursue Collection Activities. As of September 30, 2003, Mr. Kingstone has provided $350,000, and has arranged for $350,000 of Third Party Funds, to further the Collection Activities. Mr. Kingstone has also notified the Company that he has available, on a standby basis,

15

Table of Contents

additional Kingstone Funds and/or Third Party Funds to pursue further Collection Activities. In consideration for providing Kingstone Funds and/or Third Party Funds for Collection Activities, the Company has agreed to pay Mr. Kingstone 25% of amounts actually received by the Company from all Collection Activities less all costs and expenses incurred from time to time by the Company in connection with the Lawsuit, the Related Litigation and the Collection Activities, which have not been recovered by the Company. In addition, at such time as all or any part of Kingstone Funds or Third Party Funds used in Collection Activities are returned to the Company, the Company has agreed to deliver such funds, and any amounts paid over to the Company representing interest or other amounts with respect to the deposit of such funds, to Mr. Kingstone.

Critical Accounting Policies

We use certain accounting policies and procedures to manage changes that occur in our business environment that may affect accounting estimates made in preparation of our financial statements. These estimates relate primarily to our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable and provision for inventory obsolescence. Our strategy for managing doubtful accounts includes stringent, centralized credit policies and collection procedures for all customer accounts. We use a credit risk rating system in order to measure the quality of individual credit transactions. We strive to identify potential problem receivables early, take appropriate collection actions, and maintain adequate reserve levels. Our strategy for providing for inventory obsolescence includes the evaluation of existing inventory usage and realizable value. Typically, no provision is recorded for inventory that is currently used and sold within two years of purchase. We believe that our allowance for doubtful accounts and provision for inventory obsolescence is adequate at the end of each of December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2003.

The Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report. Based on the evaluation, performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the evaluation.

16

Table of Contents

PART II

On July 18, 2003 Super Vision filed suit (case number CI 99-932) against defendant, Ocean Bank of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida (the “Bank”) in the Circuit Court of the 9^th Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County Florida. The suit alleges that the Bank aided and abetted the efforts of Marsam Trading Corporation, Optic Tech International and the Wu Family of Shanghai, Hong Kong and Miami to avoid the enforcement of a court ordered injunction and the collection of a $33.1 million judgment and additional legal fees awarded to Super Vision in September of 2002 by an Orange County Jury in State civil proceedings under case number CI 99-9392. The Wu Family and their numerous associated corporations in the U.S. and China were found liable on more than twelve counts in that lawsuit including Theft of Trade Secrets, Fraud, Violations of Florida’s RICO Act, Negligent Destruction of Evidence and Civil Theft as described in a partial final judgment dated October 30, 2002 under the above case number. A separate criminal case has been under investigation by the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s Office. Super Vision has received testimony and affidavits that suggest the Bank may have liability for its actions with certain of the Wu Defendants.

On May 29, 2003 Super Vision filed suit against Schiederwerk AG of Frankfurt, Germany in Federal Court in Orlando, Florida (case number 6:03-CV-727-ORL-18-JGG) alleging that Schiederwerk is liable for costs and expenses in excess of $300,000 required to replace numerous shipments of electronic power supplies that resulted in repeated failure. The Company is currently in settlement negotiations with Schiederwerk.

On July 24, 2003 the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K which announced the election of Anthony Nicolosi as a director of Super Vision International, Inc. Mr. Nicolosi fills a vacancy on the Company’s Board of Directors.

On August 29, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K which announced that David J. Feldman was elected a director of the Company effective September 1, 2003. Mr. Feldman fills a vacancy on the Company’s Board of Directors.

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunder duly authorized.

17